The Top 10 Most Important Paintings of All Time
It’s a well known fact that paintings and art, in general, are
inherently subjective things. Sure, we can talk about “famous” art, but
fame does not equal quality; at the end of the day, all talks about the
best or worst art of any kind come down to one basic question: what IS
art anyway? No one has the definite answer and, if they claim to, then
they are filthy, filthy liars and what do we do with liars?
That’s right, maple syrup enemas, but we’re getting off track. The
point is that it’s impossible to talk about the Top 10 Paintings of All
Time without judging each one in its own respective category. So…
that’s exactly what I did? And… here they are, I guess?
10. No. 5, 1948 (Jackson Pollock)
The most: Expensive
Pollock’s
abstract,
almost violently expressionist, style tends to divide people
into two large groups: those who think that he ran the greatest long con
in history by disguising paint drippings as art, and those who think
that he was just really untalented and most of his paintings were meant
to be bowls of fruit. There however is a third, tiny group of people
who genuinely admire Pollock’s work and are ready to pay big money for it. 156.8 million (adjusted for inflation), real American dollars, to be exact, which is what Pollock’s No. 5, 1948
fetched in 2006 after being sold to an anonymous buyer. Remember
kids, if you’re rich then it is “eccentric” instead of “batcrap
retarded.”
9. The Arnolfini Wedding (Jan van Eyck)
The most: Easter Egg-y
This 1434 oil painting is believed to show an Italian merchant with his wife and one of the pimpest hats in the history of
pimping
which, as I’m sure you know, ain’t easy. Looking at it, it’s easy to
dismiss this portrait as just another piece of old art featuring dead
rich folks but, if you go all CSI on it and zoom in on the small, round
mirror in the back you will see a map pointing to the location of the
HOLY GRAIL!
OK, not really, but the mirror does show
two additional characters
standing in the room in front of the Arnolfinis, one of them allegedly
van Eyck himself. Scholars assume that the artist used a magnifying
glass to paint the fine details on this completely unnecessary part of
the scenery thus creating one of the first Easter Eggs in art history
and an early documented example of Facebook mirror photography.
Source
8. Black Square (Kazimir Malevich)
The most: Simple
The Ukraine-born Malevich is credited as the creator of Suprematism
which, to my surprise, is an actual name of a real art form. The basics
of Suprematism boil down to “simple geometric shapes” and
Black Square might be the style’s greatest example. It’s bold, yet timid. Passionate, yet lifeless. Square, and yet round…
Fine, so it’s just a black
square,
but even though looks more like a parody of a real painting, don’t let
it fool you; almost every work by Malevich is worth upwards to a million
dollars. You are free to let that totally depress you.
7. Composition 8 (Vasily Kandinsky)
The most: Artsy
Though no one has a definite answer to the question of “What is art?”
many people may agree on something like “Whatever is created to convey a
message from the author” and, in this regard, Kandinsky out-arts all
the other suckers in the business.
Kandinsky
spent his life trying to find the perfect combination of shapes and
colors to show people just how he saw and experienced the world. Now,
looking at
Composition 8, you’re in your rights to think that
he was obviously a dangerous loon with at least three schizophrenias,
but modern researchers believe Kandinsky was in fact suffering from
synesthesia, a condition which sort of mixes one’s senses. A person with synesthesia might thus actually hear color and see
music
and, if that was the case with Kandinsky, then that man lived in a
colorful, melodious universe that us mere mortals can only dream of ever
understanding.
Composition 8 does at least try to explain it though, making it a true example of “art” if there ever was any.
Source
Source 2
6. The Third of May 1808 (Francisco Goya)
The most: Gritty
Goya’s
The Third of May 1808 is…disturbing, to say the
least. It shows a Napoleonic firing squad killing a bunch of Spanish
guys who participated in the resistance against Bonaparte’s army. It’s
not heroic, it’s not inspiring, and you can clearly see dread and
pants-wetting
fear in the eyes of the guy with the outstretched arms as he’s on his
knees, waiting for the painful, hot lead death that is coming in the
next 2-3 seconds. Geez, you can almost picture Goya with heavy
eyeliner, listening to industrial metal while painting this. But that’s
the thing: no one has done this before. Up until then all paintings of
war were about glory and honor, which you’d expect from people who
obviously have never seen a real war.Goya put an end to it. He gave the
entire war painting genre a gritty reboot, which technically makes
The Third of May 1808 the
Batman Begins of the art world.
Source
5. Guernica (Pablo Picasso)
The most: Trippy
You can’t really see it here, but Picasso’s
Guernica is
HUGE,
measuring 11×25.6ft . It features humans, animals and buildings, all
depicted in that famous Picasso style which I still claim was an inside
joke of his that got out of hand, but let’s move past that.
Guernica
is definitely one of the most all-encapsulating Picasso works, but what
really sets it apart from the others is its message. Examining it, you
can’t help but feel a little uncomfortable. The twisted faces, the
solemn colors…it’s all a little…unnerving. And that’s the point,
because the painting was meant to represent the horrors of war.
Not only does
Guernica perfectly capture the weird style of
Picasso it also conveys his anti-war message like no other painting
could. Plus, if you do acid in front of it, you will see things that
man was never meant to see.
Source
4. American Gothic (Grant Wood)
The most: Parodied
American Gothic is the perfect example of being in the right
place at the right time. When it first came out it certainly did OK.
Magazines and newspapers reprinted the painting while it hanged
comfortably in the Art Institute of Chicago but, with the onset of the
Great Depression, it became something more to the people. It became a
symbol of an unwavering spirit in the face of adversity, celebrating the
struggling Midwestern Americans who held their own during desperate
times. So naturally, with time, it became the most satirized piece of
popular culture in the U.S.
Name a franchise, character or location and chances are that there’s an existing
American Gothic
parody of it. Yes, there’s a Muppet version. Dexter? Yeah, it
exists. Grim Fandango? You betcha. And yes, of course there’s a porn
version of it. That just goes without saying.
Source
3. Saturn Devouring His Son (Francisco Goya)
The most: Terrifying
Hey look, it’s our friend Francisco “Raven” Goya, with a solid
helping of sanity-shattering nightmare fuel. Look at that thing. Look
at its bizarre hobo beard. Look at the huge anime-esque eyes and the
bodybuilder physique. LOOK AT IT TOTALLY EATING A GUY AND LETTING YOU
KNOW THAT YOU ARE NEXT. Crap on a stick, that is some sick stuff. But
it has a reasonable explanation. That monster thing is
Saturn,
a Roman god said to devour his children because it was foretold that
one of them will overthrow him. It is pretty gruesome, but at least
there’s some reason behind it. However, why Goya decided to paint THAT
in his dining room
will remain a mystery to all of us who don’t constantly hear the crying
of a thousand infants in our heads like Goya obviously did.
Source
2. The Birth of Venus (Sandro Botticelli)
The most: Easily used as a substitute for porn
Look, we’re all guys here (unless you’re a woman, in which case I’d like to apologize for how my gender behaves on the
Internet). Yes, Botticelli’s
The Birth of Venus
is beautiful with the colors and the composition and all that other
crap but here’s the thing: that Venus is totally hot. Not too skinny,
not too chubby, her hair might very well be blonde, red or light brown
and ,though she’s naked, she only lets you see enough to kick-start your
imagination into a wild frenzy.
In short, it’s everything that good pornography should be AND it’s
socially acceptable to hang on your living room wall. Hahaha, it’s
almost as if the concept of pornography and erotica was retardedly
arbitrary and subjected to constantly changing social norms. But that
would be stupid.
Source
1. Campbell’s Soup Cans (Andy Warhol)
The most: Genre-defying
Warhol’s
Campbell Soup series of paintings, of which there
are 32, tell so much with so little, and I totally understand it if
anyone out there just felt like punching me in the throat for that
sentence. But it’s true. When you think of a non-surreal or
non-abstract example of something that defied the concept of art being
just pretty pictures and portraits, you think of Warhol’s paintings.
When you want a great example of truly modern art, you think of
Campbell’s Soup, which also skillfully hail back to Warhol’s early days as a commercial artist. And when you get down to it, it’s basically a
parody
of the boringly cliché bowl of fruit. Not many other paintings manage
to do all that while showing a tin can full of salty cat urine (oh you
all know it’s true).
Source
BONUS: Mona Lisa (Leonardo da Vinci)
The most: Likely to offend people if you don’t include it on a list of greatest paintings ever
There is almost nothing new anyone can say about
Mona Lisa.
You know the painting, you know the author, you’ve seen and puzzled over
Liz’s half smile, which is like a ray of sunshine shining through a sea
of gray clouds on a timid spring’s day, filling your soul with hope and
happiness but also making you miserable at the same time because you
know no real woman could ever compare to Mona Lisa so in your
desperation you order a high-quality latex mask with her face on it and
stick it on a mannequin made from three pillows stuffed inside women’s
clothing which you’ve bought at a thrift store at three in the morning
and…sorry, I forgot where I was going with this.
Anyway, like I was saying, it seems that everything that could have been said about
Mona Lisa
was said already, so you would need to start making some pretty bizarre
claims about it to get the media to pay attention to you. Bizarre
stuff like how “she” might actually be a man. [Insert Austin Powers
quote here]. At least, that’s what a bunch of Italian researchers are
claiming – that
Mona Lisa is actually based on Leo’s effeminate young artist friend, thus opening a possibility for a future
Da Vinci Code/Crying Game crossover.